<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
<title>International Journal of Research in English Education</title>
<title_fa>مجله بین‌المللی تحقیقات در آموزش زبان انگلیسی</title_fa>
<short_title>IJREE</short_title>
<subject>Literature &amp; Humanities</subject>
<web_url>http://ijreeonline.com</web_url>
<journal_hbi_system_id>1</journal_hbi_system_id>
<journal_hbi_system_user>admin</journal_hbi_system_user>
<journal_id_issn>2538-3027</journal_id_issn>
<journal_id_issn_online>2538-3027</journal_id_issn_online>
<journal_id_pii>8</journal_id_pii>
<journal_id_doi>10.52547/ijree</journal_id_doi>
<journal_id_iranmedex></journal_id_iranmedex>
<journal_id_magiran></journal_id_magiran>
<journal_id_sid>_</journal_id_sid>
<journal_id_nlai>_</journal_id_nlai>
<journal_id_science>_</journal_id_science>
<language>en</language>
<pubdate>
	<type>jalali</type>
	<year>1396</year>
	<month>9</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<pubdate>
	<type>gregorian</type>
	<year>2017</year>
	<month>12</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<volume>2</volume>
<number>4</number>
<publish_type>online</publish_type>
<publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
<article_type>fulltext</article_type>
<articleset>
	<article>


	<language>en</language>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<title_fa>تحلیل مقابله ای پیکره ای راهبردهای حالت در متون علمی نویسندگان ایرانی و انگلیسی با تاکید بر بخش های مقدمه و بحث و نتیجه گیری </title_fa>
	<title>A Corpus-Based Contrastive Analysis of Stance Strategies in Native and Nonnative Speakers’ English Academic Writings: Introduction and Discussion Sections in Focus</title>
	<subject_fa>عمومى</subject_fa>
	<subject>General</subject>
	<content_type_fa>پژوهشي</content_type_fa>
	<content_type>Research</content_type>
	<abstract_fa>&lt;span style=&quot;color:windowtext;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:times new roman,serif;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt;&quot;&gt;The present study was an attempt to illustrate the interaction between writers and readers. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:windowtext;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:times new roman,serif;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt;&quot;&gt;Conveying of the writers&amp;rsquo; voice, stance, and interaction with reader was put forward within this paradigm. Being a good academic writer is highly &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:windowtext;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:times new roman,serif;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt;&quot;&gt;related to the use of these strategies.&amp;nbsp; Adopting a position and persuading readers of claims are very important. This study was aimed at showing the differences between Iranian and American M.A. EFL writers in using stance strategies (hedges, boosters, attitude markers, and self-mentions) in Introduction and Discussion sections of academic papers. The corpora for this study were 40 articles (20 for American native and 20 for Iranian nonnative writers) from different journals such as Journal of Research Studies in Education, English language Teaching, System, TESOL Quarterly, and ELT. The significance and frequency of items were calculated using SPSS software version 22. Such statistical tools as frequency, percentage, and Chi-square were utilized to analyze the collected data. The findings showed that there was no statistically significant difference between native and nonnative writers in using stance strategies although native writers tended to use hedges, attitude markers, and self-mentions comparatively more than nonnatives, whereas nonnative writers used a greater number of boosters.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;</abstract_fa>
	<abstract>&lt;p&gt;The present study was an attempt to illustrate the interaction between writers and readers. Conveying of the writers&amp;rsquo; voice, stance, and interaction with reader was put forward within this paradigm. Being a good academic writer is highly related to the use of these strategies.&amp;nbsp; Adopting a position and persuading readers of claims are very important. This study was aimed at showing the differences between Iranian and American M.A. EFL writers in using stance strategies (hedges, boosters, attitude markers, and self-mentions) in Introduction and Discussion sections of academic papers. The corpora for this study were 40 articles (20 for American native and 20 for Iranian nonnative writers) from different journals such as Journal of Research Studies in Education, English language Teaching, System, TESOL Quarterly, and ELT. The significance and frequency of items were calculated using SPSS software version 22. Such statistical tools as frequency, percentage, and Chi-square were utilized to analyze the collected data. The findings showed that there was no statistically significant difference between native and nonnative writers in using stance strategies although native writers tended to use hedges, attitude markers, and self-mentions comparatively more than nonnatives, whereas nonnative writers used a greater number of boosters.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
</abstract>
	<keyword_fa>attitude markers, boosters, hedges, self-mentions, stance strategies, native vs. nonnative writers </keyword_fa>
	<keyword>attitude markers, boosters, hedges, self-mentions, stance strategies, native vs. nonnative writers </keyword>
	<start_page>31</start_page>
	<end_page>40</end_page>
	<web_url>http://ijreeonline.com/browse.php?a_code=A-10-58-1&amp;slc_lang=en&amp;sid=1</web_url>


<author_list>
	<author>
	<first_name>Milad</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Shirzadi</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>1003194753284600755</code>
	<orcid>1003194753284600755</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of English, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Farzad</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Akhgar</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>1003194753284600756</code>
	<orcid>1003194753284600756</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of English, Shahreza Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahreza, Iran</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Amir</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Rooholamin</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>1003194753284600757</code>
	<orcid>1003194753284600757</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of English, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Sajad</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Shafiee</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa>سجاد</first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa>شفیعی</last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>shafiee_sajad@yahoo.com</email>
	<code>1003194753284600758</code>
	<orcid>1003194753284600758</orcid>
	<coreauthor>Yes
</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of English, Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa>دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد شهرکرد</affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


</author_list>


	</article>
</articleset>
</journal>
