<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
<title>International Journal of Research in English Education</title>
<title_fa>مجله بین‌المللی تحقیقات در آموزش زبان انگلیسی</title_fa>
<short_title>IJREE</short_title>
<subject>Literature &amp; Humanities</subject>
<web_url>http://ijreeonline.com</web_url>
<journal_hbi_system_id>1</journal_hbi_system_id>
<journal_hbi_system_user>admin</journal_hbi_system_user>
<journal_id_issn>2538-3027</journal_id_issn>
<journal_id_issn_online>2538-3027</journal_id_issn_online>
<journal_id_pii>8</journal_id_pii>
<journal_id_doi>10.52547/ijree</journal_id_doi>
<journal_id_iranmedex></journal_id_iranmedex>
<journal_id_magiran></journal_id_magiran>
<journal_id_sid>_</journal_id_sid>
<journal_id_nlai>_</journal_id_nlai>
<journal_id_science>_</journal_id_science>
<language>en</language>
<pubdate>
	<type>jalali</type>
	<year>1396</year>
	<month>3</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<pubdate>
	<type>gregorian</type>
	<year>2017</year>
	<month>6</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<volume>2</volume>
<number>2</number>
<publish_type>online</publish_type>
<publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
<article_type>fulltext</article_type>
<articleset>
	<article>


	<language>en</language>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<title_fa> اولویت بازخورد اصلاحی معلمان انگلیسی و بافت آموزشی</title_fa>
	<title>Educational Context and ELT Teachers’ Corrective Feedback  Preference: Public and Private School Teachers in Focus</title>
	<subject_fa>تخصصي</subject_fa>
	<subject>Special</subject>
	<content_type_fa>پژوهشي</content_type_fa>
	<content_type>Research</content_type>
	<abstract_fa>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:black;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt;&quot;&gt;This study investigated the possible relationship between educational context and English Language Teaching (ELT) teachers&amp;rsquo; corrective feedback preference. To this end, 42 Iranian EEFL teachers from some private language institutes and 39 Iranian EFL teachers from different schools in Shiraz, Iran participated in the study. The Questionnaire for Corrective Feedback Approaches (QCFAs) was used as the instrument in this study. The questionnaire consisted of five different approaches of error correction: repetition, recast, elicitation, explicit correction, clarification, and request. In order to compare the preferred corrective feedback perceived by the institute instructors and school teachers, the researchers ran the Mann-Whitney&amp;rsquo;s U test. The results revealed that the school teachers preferred the repetition approach most frequently, followed by clarification request, elicitation, explicit correction, and recast. On the other hand, the institute instructors chose the recast approach, clarification request approach, elicitation, explicit correction, and repetition in the order of their preference for error correction. The findings also showed that the school teachers significantly preferred the explicit correction and repetition more than private (institute) teachers.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</abstract_fa>
	<abstract>&lt;p&gt;This study investigated the possible relationship between educational context and English Language Teaching (ELT) teachers&amp;rsquo; corrective feedback preference. To this end, 42 Iranian EEFL teachers from some private language institutes and 39 Iranian EFL teachers from different schools in Shiraz, Iran participated in the study. The Questionnaire for Corrective Feedback Approaches (QCFAs) was used as the instrument in this study. The questionnaire consisted of five different approaches of error correction: repetition, recast, elicitation, explicit correction, clarification, and request. In order to compare the preferred corrective feedback perceived by the institute instructors and school teachers, the researchers ran the Mann-Whitney&amp;rsquo;s U test. The results revealed that the school teachers preferred the repetition approach most frequently, followed by clarification request, elicitation, explicit correction, and recast. On the other hand, the institute instructors chose the recast approach, clarification request approach, elicitation, explicit correction, and repetition in the order of their preference for error correction. The findings also showed that the school teachers significantly preferred the explicit correction and repetition more than private (institute) teachers.&lt;/p&gt;
</abstract>
	<keyword_fa>corrective feedback, educational context, Iranian EFL teachers</keyword_fa>
	<keyword>corrective feedback, educational context, Iranian EFL teachers</keyword>
	<start_page>10</start_page>
	<end_page>15</end_page>
	<web_url>http://ijreeonline.com/browse.php?a_code=A-10-41-1&amp;slc_lang=en&amp;sid=1</web_url>


<author_list>
	<author>
	<first_name>Behnam</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Behroozi</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa>Behnam</first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa>Behroozi</last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>1003194753284600718</code>
	<orcid>1003194753284600718</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Marvdasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Iran</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa>Marvdasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Iran</affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Amin</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Karimnia</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa>Amin</first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa>Karimnia</last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>aminkarimnia@yahoo.com</email>
	<code>1003194753284600719</code>
	<orcid>1003194753284600719</orcid>
	<coreauthor>Yes
</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Fasa Branch, Islamic Azad University, Iran</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa>Fasa Branch, Islamic Azad University, Iran</affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


</author_list>


	</article>
</articleset>
</journal>
